The clause mentions delays by the architect pending arbitration. Which statement best describes this relationship?

The clause mentions delays by the architect pending arbitration. Which statement best describes this relationship?

• A. Arbitration must finish before any extension is granted
• B. The extension cannot be granted until arbitration is complete
• C. The extension is not affected by arbitration
• D. Extensions may be allowed during arbitration

Answer: (D)

Delays caused by the architect while arbitration is still underway can justify a time extension. The idea is that when the dispute process is in progress, the project schedule may be affected through no fault of the contractor, so permitting extensions during arbitration prevents unfair penalties and recognizes the procedural delay. This makes sense because the architect’s delay is tied to the dispute resolution itself, not to the contractor’s performance. If extensions were contingent on arbitration finishing first or if arbitration didn’t affect the extension at all, the project could unfairly suffer or ignore the impact of the dispute. Therefore, the statement that extensions may be allowed during arbitration best matches the clause describing delays pending arbitration.

Delays caused by the architect while arbitration is still underway can justify a time extension. The idea is that when the dispute process is in progress, the project schedule may be affected through no fault of the contractor, so permitting extensions during arbitration prevents unfair penalties and recognizes the procedural delay. This makes sense because the architect’s delay is tied to the dispute resolution itself, not to the contractor’s performance.

If extensions were contingent on arbitration finishing first or if arbitration didn’t affect the extension at all, the project could unfairly suffer or ignore the impact of the dispute. Therefore, the statement that extensions may be allowed during arbitration best matches the clause describing delays pending arbitration.