In discrepancies between drawings and specifications, which shall take control?

In discrepancies between drawings and specifications, which shall take control?

• A. Architect
• B. Contractor
• C. Specs
• D. Owner

Answer: (C)

When there is a discrepancy between drawings and specifications, the written specifications take precedence. The specs define the exact materials, performance criteria, standards, and installation methods that must be met, serving as the authoritative source for quality and compliance. Drawings show the layout and spatial details, but they illustrate rather than prescribe every requirement. If a conflict arises, the contract is interpreted in favor of the specifications, and any needed clarifications or changes should go through the proper process (e.g., addenda or change orders) to maintain a single, enforceable standard. The other options don’t fit because they don’t establish the formal requirements that govern quality and performance; the specifications are the controlling document in these conflicts.

When there is a discrepancy between drawings and specifications, the written specifications take precedence. The specs define the exact materials, performance criteria, standards, and installation methods that must be met, serving as the authoritative source for quality and compliance. Drawings show the layout and spatial details, but they illustrate rather than prescribe every requirement. If a conflict arises, the contract is interpreted in favor of the specifications, and any needed clarifications or changes should go through the proper process (e.g., addenda or change orders) to maintain a single, enforceable standard. The other options don’t fit because they don’t establish the formal requirements that govern quality and performance; the specifications are the controlling document in these conflicts.